小费
胜
1.
Sondicow (1)
3.
Coding (3)
6.
Metric Buster (6)
SONDICOW (trap 1) is likely to carry the majority of support in this contest and should get the job done providing he sidesteps the bother spots. Coding (trap 3) can quickly head the formation but may succumb to the selection when it matters. The downgrade for Metric Buster (trap 6) may be significant.
名次
1. Sondicow (1)
F
- T
P. Maynard 没有数据
2. Crokers Music (2)
F
- T
J. Danahar 没有数据
3. Coding (3)
F
- T
C. Darch 没有数据
4. Riverside Chilli (4)
F
- T
S. Pilgrim 没有数据
5. Hawkfield Ellie (5)
F
- T
D. Davy 没有数据
6. Metric Buster (6)
F
- T
G. Wright 没有数据
其他规则: 仅支付二个名次的彩金。 SP:开赛赔率是 Stake 提供的最终固定价格。
| 游戏 | 玩家 | 时间 | 投注额 | 乘数 | 支付额 |
|---|
